Trend Musical Instruments & DJ PA & Stage


Top Customer Reviews: Behringer XM8500 ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
5 / 5 by
The cost has checked 85 / B++

Ossia the vocal microphone very competent for the price adds. Taken on his own terms, in ignorant price, ossia the decent dynamic mic with excellent construction. It is the good election for studios of house or rooms that has not been has treated acoustically. It does not choose on a lot of noise of some sides or behind, so that it minimises the echo or the feedback that use with the PA system.

Is like this as well as the industry regulates hand-held dynamic vowel mic, a Shure SM58? Any enough, but near...
Some bass proximity the effect is slightly more evident, as he boom the bit if a lot look for (especially voices viriles).
A mid-the row is slightly less diverse of a SM58, but is well.
There is marginally more managing noise that with a SM58, but so only takes the pair of mins to imagine was regarding the hand-held use and is the not issuing use the stand.
With these points are A lot of picky and have them remarked so only in the side for comparison lateralmente with SM58. For vocal use, you my desire to add the pop of foam-filter. An economic one will do (p. p.ej. 1-2).

+ Well For the half noisy means and refusing of the his axial (i.et. Rear noise/of the sides)
+ Animate vocals
+ Relatively net of audio
+ construction Very solid in house of metal (feels resembled Shure SM58)

Good election for the podcast, mobile DJ, studio of house, university/of schools. In professional of the upper end acts a SM58 is better, but for the slender margin. The majority of people will find this the good election. With a calm money saved can buy the decent mic stand and the Behringer XLR the USB 502 mixer. Ossia Amazing value .

He A Shure SM58 is quell'has bitten better, but any 5x better! It is the classical example of diminishing returns. All some weaknesses can be done around, as you are spending your money buys this.

My photo aims a Behringer (sinister) afterwards to the Shure SM58 (right) for some purposes of comparison. A filter of pop of the foam to some sinister accesses neither.
4 / 5 by
The cost has checked was the little sceptic in a price and that quality of sound would take partorisca form this Microphone but has taken it casualidad in all the chance partorisca tests.

Needless Partorisca Say am impressed with him!

The container is the plot more than the thought - the hard chance with the cushion of foam houses a microphone, and the mic the clip is tucked in there also (has not expected that!)
A mic is weighted really amiably and has finalised was professionally. His obviously modelled in a SM58 benchmark and done the very good work in that!

Connecting he until my PA fixes - obviously the regulate XLR the returns of boss perfectly without subject - a row of discharge in front of a mic was a lot of and residual noice has not caused the feedback inclusa when I have dipped up in my living room in front of some speakers (obviously not signalling in some speakers!) The tone has achieved was slightly 'warmer/bassier' that my forward SM58, but some adjustments in a EQ and are sper happy with a sound.

In an end of a day, his no a SM58, but his also the fraction of a price! For me it takes 5 stars sure!
4 / 5 by
The cost has verified Ossia the decent microphone , included without considering a price. If calm so only is taking the production of music, is the good place partorisca begin :
- fact of the usable register of acoustic instruments
-He the decent work in viril vocals
- has to that record in the room without acoustic treatment, looks partorisca tolerate these better that the condenser (but still touches better with acoustic treatment)
-does not require partorisca be maintained in his box like calm with the condenser. For this can remain place up and ready partorisca use.
When you Buy the better microphone (which will cost you at least 80), this a still will have his uses:
-can utilisations he partorisca alive action
-Ossia a one that will leave you was when any one asks partorisca take loaned the microphone
-anchors It can remain on in a mic stand all of a time, in of the strikes of inspiration of the chance.
Does not forget partorisca buy a XLR-XLR boss, mic stand, interface of audio and DAW. At all for him.
5 / 5 by
The cost checked has bought 2 of these in a last pair of month, a rest of a band has suggested taking Shure SM58s, but has not had of the money partorisca that, as it take these and has had any question, sound like this as well as we require him to us to and does not remark any difference among them and a Shure is. Everything for 1/6th of a price. The only critic has is some clips of way of microphone to look comprised too small to returned an iron of a microphone, but has not had to use them in all the chance to the equal that have had already has adapted some
4 / 5 by
The cost has verified Really can does not be missing this partorisca a price. I have used he partorisca vocals and partorisca miking amps. At the beginning the used with a sm58 in the combo electrical guitar amp and is them spent some have thought of time I routed wrongly like two mics was like this looked. A mic has the good weight, feels sturdy, can manage pressure of his big and there is so only the touch less than the pointy midrange that a sm57 partorisca heavy electrical guitars. Partorisca vocals Would use this or a sm58 interchangeably - preferring this simply because yes it breaks was like this economic to substitute.
5 / 5 by
The cost has verified partorisca buy these partorisca church.
Has had one of a SM58 mics and take the little of these Behringer some partorisca have extra singers.

Can not say a difference in a quality of sound.

These do really well and is surprising considering a price.
5 / 5 by
The cost has checked well, like this partorisca this calm price knows it will not be the Shure SM58, but believe me, unless you are doing in the professional recording studio, calm will not be able to say a difference. It is solid, done a lot well, and does a work brilliantly. I have bought one of these partorisca my edges partorisca use in his band after listening a start of an economic mic at present uses. I have wanted to take a SM58, but so only could not justify an extra cost, how has been for a XM8500 after reading descriptions of pro musicians and registering expert - and am like this happy has done. For a money, a XM8500 has not beaten can be!
5 / 5 by
The cost has checked That the add mic. Has has wanted to something abordable that would create his of voice of the quality when plugged to the little portable amplifier and ossia. Has-liked me a fact that is insulated against feedback because this has been the question partorisca me in a past using economic crew. It takings partorisca A price is the solidly the microphone has built that the chair adds in a hand and extracted really well. Any feedback inclusa when when being in front of a speaker of portable/amplifier. Sure you mean it has to that tilt a mic to you and speak a lot of his - the will not listen tongues to a side of him. But I prefer to use it mic that way in all the chance. Another thing can do is partorisca press a mic against your chin and resist it whole and listen you then reason a sound is coming from directly on. Calm only need partorisca buy it mic agreement also, but has found Stagg SMC6 6 boss of the metre of microphone regulates economic in 6 if you are plugging to a XLR connector.
4 / 5 by
The cost has verified are the gigging music, has the band and also run the series of Open Mic chance and usually use SM58s and SM57s like the subject of course. I have been lately the mic or two short when mic-ing multiple artists in of the bands. I did not like him dipping out of the tonne of money in a Shures has used partorisca years, as has thinks that would order one of this so much the transmission. Out of the curiosity has used one of this main vocal pleasure mic for an evening and was blown absolutely was because I credit one was of vocal sound. Any subjects of feedbacks or any negatives and in fact looks to do all the prjimo-the vocal field mic would owe that - and do well. I have been impressed for as solid a mic felt also, feels like the quality has bitten of boxes and is presented amiably in a box. I am influenced by my ears more than snobbery or seal of price - if this has had of the rubbish of summer , would say like this. These are really utmost mics and resist his own good in quality of his against his plus illustrious and expensive counterparts. I buy again? You have bet I .
5 / 5 by
The cost verified has been singing in of the bands partorisca the years that use a gone the SM58. I do in in the seven coverages of piece sell interior a moment and spend around the chance with 6 SM58 is around 600 value of boxes. Has thinks that would take some economic plus mics so only partorisca test of band partorisca save some wear and tear in a Shures. The mine research and has taken to three band of a XM1800s mics. First time uses them to us was more than impressed by a quality of a sound. In this base has bought the XM8500 so only partorisca me in test ( some two daughters and the bassist that use a 1800 is.) It has impressed TOTALLY. An exclusion of environmental noise is excellent and needs that in the smallish space of test with two electrical guitars ,bass, the keyboards and the drums that goes in everywhere you. Have Still partorisca persuade our engineer of the his to leave me partorisca use this alive , waste because it was necessary to change all some parameters in a X32 the office but am doing on that. It suspects that this mike easily would resist is adapted against a SM58 in the alive situation. If calm so only is beginning is gone in the band or just need some transmission mics can any gone bad with these in this price. Forget all a snobbery and use your ears.
5 / 5 by
A Behringer XM8500 the dynamic microphone comes highly recommended in a lot of places, and a prize is very attractive, as I have decided to give the the gone to the record audio partorisca ran on-line creates.

Is a XLR microphone and, then , need an interface of audio. I am using a Behringer UMC202HD. I am registering in Audacity in the Lenovo T450 Windows 10 computers. I attach the clip of a register without any step and with accusing addition (normalisation to -2db, compression and equalisation).

A quality of a register of voice looks very clear and I like a fact that does not choose on external noises - my office of the house does not have the cabin of his and noises of the vehicles that spends in a street or the dogs that the park would choose up in mine condenser mic. I have had to that have a profit in an interface of audio is resembled maximum to record and, in some circumstances could wants to consider stronger pre-amplification (p. p.ej. Using like the PA, or singing on phase).

This in spite of, for my work of audio, thinks that a sound is well and certainly registers good and clearly. For a prize, particularly yes calms so only is beginning was, thinks that ossia the microphone adds with the good clear tone.

UPDATE: With which three weeks have done as to use a microphone to better effect. I have bought the new office mic stand so that a BM8500 chairs in a level of my mouth. I speak to a mic clearly but a lot noisily of roughly 3 thumbs was (with the filter of pop in place) and record in the good level with a profit dipped to roughly 80 (Behringer UMC202HD interface of audio). A register of audio is clear and free of background noise. Five stars for a mic.
4 / 5 by
Has been singing in of the bands for the years that use a gone to SM58. I do in in the seven coverages of piece sell interior a moment and spend around the chance with 6 SM58 is around £600 value of boxes. Has thinks that would take some economic plus mics so only for test of band to save some wear and tear in a Shures. The mine research and has taken to three band of a XM1800s mics. First time uses them to the knots was more than impressed by a quality of a sound. In this base has bought the XM8500 only for me in test ( some two daughters and the bassist that use a 1800 is.) It has impressed TOTALLY. An exclusion of environmental noise is excellent and needs that in the smallish space of test with two electrical guitars ,bass, the keyboards and the drums that goes in everywhere you. Have Still to persuade our engineer of the his to leave me to use this alive , waste because it was necessary to change all some parameters in a X32 the office but am doing on that. It suspects that this mike easily would resist is adapted against a SM58 in the alive situation. If calm so only is beginning is gone in the band or just need some transmission mics can any gone bad with these in this prize. Forget all a snobbery and use your ears.
4 / 5 by
Was compraventa for the secondary microphone for an open mic I host, and there is wanted also the backside up in chance my Shure SM58 the beta has packed up during the action.
In the bed those countless descriptions in several mics has been swung for some descriptions in this Behringer, particularly some descriptions of 'DS' and 'Celene Is - both have the utmost data revise which fully corroborates.
In short, this mic is slightly more the heavy bass that a SM58 beta, and my ear perhaps slightly stronger (subjectivity, but another has said some same) and looks the thinnest fraction in an upper row, but come on, for £20 can does not be missing this microphone.
And, quite embarrassingly still Shure, this mic comes with the solid of hard chance, more than a stock exchange of cloth, like this surer when any into use.
5 / 5 by
He a work. A fact that has come he with this solid chance, the frames looks to prize mic (concealed often has any chance :) ). For like this, people that use a venue, where has added the to eshared' crew, use and treat he with fashionable cure himself was of the a lot of note produced main. When that Pause roughly the when being the product to note main..., I often transmissions with much more expensive Shure mics- a lot of casualidad my alive audience would find the difference (this one is stronger this in spite of-Shure some precise be amped arrive). For professional register... Perhaps they are freaking was- I use pro mics... . This in spite of, for daily use, is my primary mic (90 speach, 10 random vowel). Honradamente, can not improve produced for a prize.
4 / 5 by
First microphone has not possessed never but his reassuringly heavy, feels done a lot well, the look adds and among an excellent quality spends chance. One spends the chance looks the little bit like would have to that be spend the 9of mm pistol and has quite a lot of sponge cushioning inner that has to that it withstand the small apocalypse. Going to be using he for my tongue of pair like this hopefully does not leave me down, initial testing with a Stagg advantage in the small PA the system suggests it will do perfectly.
4 / 5 by
There has any a lot of to say averts of 'this is the fantastic microphone'. The imports of bear is the cardioid mic, the meaning chooses on the majority of his of a front and less to a side and behind. This took initially was as it looks a omnidirectional model.

A mic among the sturdy chance with the foam inlay and the clip to ray he to the mic stand. There is not any boss has comprised he like this precise and XLR to XLR or XLR to jack that depends in that is plugging he to.

Now that they are of the tower in stock goes to order the little more, really is that well.
5 / 5 by
This mic is has arrived broken with the dodgy free connection
am quite expert in electronic has opened it like this up and resoldered some connections that fixed a subject.

Behringer Obviously require improve in his control of quality. ( They have had included a cheek to comprise the certificate of control of the quality with still focus of the control of the quality stamped on he) was obvious of a second I plugged he in that there is subject.
Has fixed once a mic is the quite good quality mic for a prize.

Is more expensive state would be it returned but for a prize simply is not the value that returns.
5 / 5 by
Has had to that give this mic 5 stars, included although it is not to perfect. Reason? It is quite simply a better value SM58 the copy has found. It is a lot of mid and the bass concentrated and circles of a highs, as it can not adapt all the vocalists. An only question for vocal use that has found is the light tendency to stress 'plosives'. It is also excellent for micing amps - I use he in mine grave amp - and probably will be good for drum micing also. For a prize can not complain at all.
5 / 5 by
Totally in a moon with these mics. I have bought two and of then using them take my Shure irradiate mics for some shows of adult so only. These are perfect for my shows of boys, uses him with my Bose S1 Pro together with Hercules mic stand and 2 x 6m XLR boss. At all it cover it to some hands, Chris has treated so only P Tee Comedy Magic Show in of the living rooms the rooms of banquet, any worry in battery, hands or wireless mics that ruin . These creatures are a lot of sturdy and the sound adds. Also, a lot directional, which does not mean any feedback. Recommended.
5 / 5 by
Bought for mine 12 old year to develop his superstar potential. A quality of the his touched by means of the electrical guitar amp is more than pertinent for his needs and there is sprain very small in of the levels of the main volume, no too heavy and comes with a mic group for use in the stand. This is not the mic that would be used by serious interpreters this in spite of for publics that speaks or the musicians that begins was is more than pertinent. Note that does not comprise a boss and a mic has a lot on/was key how is controlled invernadero your amp or speaker.
4 / 5 by
Among the orderly hard plastic spends chance with clip of stand of the microphone that comprises one 3/8 adapter. Organism of rock of solid metal, any complaint roughly quality of build. XLR So only, and comes without boss. It connects easily. It ignores that says on build them in two pop of filter of phase and use an outside one registering of this microphone. Quality of his excellent and no only for a prize. Only downside is very on/was transmission, but at least ossia a less what for gone bad. Considering buying more for use with my podcast. It calms that can take more economic elsewhere but will pay to surpass like this he evens up. Highly recommended for register of voice of the house.
4 / 5 by
Has been using these for enough the moment to rent to several singers. Absolutely any complaint until they listen that it is it cost. He cant be difficult to copy one 30+ old year SM58 and while these have his acute plus that SM58 (which is well for some singers but a lot all) is a lot handy for the general use and I do not concern too much if one odd one goes to lose. Well for advantage vocals, BV is, miking on electrical guitars. Calm would be necessary to maintain them in a has resupplied the box cushioned reason line quite easily yes left in the box with other elements rattling around - or so only buy new some /when this spends
5 / 5 by
Bought to substitute one some concealed is coming with our new karaoke player that the way has had too much sprain/crackling, in that likes the engineer of the his for my woman (seeds-pro singer) for several years have the little knowledge in that to look for in the good microphone. These are almost (and is very next) as well as all hallowed Shure SM58s but has not loved to spend this class of money in mics for the house karaoke, in fact these are that well that goes to invest in the little more!!
4 / 5 by
For a money, does not have any complaint. I have used this to substitute my Blue USB Yeti reason are not never able state to match a quality of audio with a setup has had with my xlr microphone. If you are looking for the low cost dynamic microphone with the good sound, this microphone is for you. No, calm will not see a BBC or pro the radio broadcasters that uses it, and has not been that it is likes for instruments and flange, but is add partorisca podcasting. And you are unsure, control out of some descriptions and give on Youtube. There is abundance of them.
4 / 5 by
Has required the mic seen this for £12 has thought is behringer that will be WELL. Well It Was the surprise when I have used likes the sound was in pair with the sm 58. Build Of good quality. He the bit of the noise when managed this was a main difference I found when compared to the 58 but no big question I use he in the stand. It has sung by means of him and he used it to register my taxi of electrical guitar, flute and acoustic electrical guitar and am very impressed with results. The value adds adds to touch mic. Well Recommend buy.
5 / 5 by
Has not been usable a day of delivery as has the Power NOT REGULATING entrance. There is any mention of him anywhere in a packaging and listing on amazon that to do a thing an also need the BOSS. DISAPPOINTED.
5 / 5 by
Had seen rave descriptions in this microphone that compares it to a Shure SM 58. Has an old plus SM58 that probably need the new boss etc, as I have bought a Behringer as I live it mic. Hardly I can say a difference in him of a SM 58. Has the Pro logical studio to house based and use the condenser of studio mic to register vocals, but has tried a Behringer in the register and was surprised really. It is cleaned really and clear with the good soft any scratchy upper coverage and full final for different vocal rows. In a prize, is to fly it. Totally impressed and would recommend.
4 / 5 by
Does not come with the directed which is understandable so that it has a lot of types and measures, how is more to order join some correct measure partorisca in £3 in eBay.
I mine of use for portable commentary in of split them of football. A build and the quality of his sound prices upper. A built in windshield a prize added that reads well. Really pleased with this product. So like this, I have bought another! You go in sturdy plastic, foam-streaky chance with mountain. Excellent. It has a lot of commentaries of the auditors that say the one who the crystal clears a quality of his east. Glorious!!
4 / 5 by
In the bed that the number of descriptions, has bought finally this; not knowing that well it was 'in real life'. But I am not disappointed.

Tried it in comparison to a SM58, and averts that it have it marginally less acute; that obviously can regulate, touches a lot, a lot of neighbour in quality. Which me really pleased with him, and that partorisca to plot less than buying the new SM58.
4 / 5 by
Has used these mics before for the tests and is really utmost. This in spite of one some have bought more recently look of the lowest quality and is not lasted likes has used to do. Any sure a spec has been altetred or so only a quality of build is poorer. Previously it has used it these for some actions also, but no longer find them of confidence quite like this gone back to AKG for alive work.
5 / 5 by
I have used the Shure SM58 of then could resupply some 30 years does. I have required the one of leftover mic partorisca take the actions and has thought would give this tries it. I tried it side for side with my SM58 in the action last week and could say hardly any difference, in some ways this mic is better, more clear-cut midrange and more exited that a Shure. I recommend it to some of mine fellow and he have sold is gone in Amazon!
4 / 5 by
Has bought a Behringer XM8500 partorisca do commentaries on Youtube. I have tried a lot of different microphones on some years and a XM8500 is for far a better a closing. A quality of his excellent east and has the sound of his warm emission.

When Compared to another microphone I occasionally use (Behringer C-1) A XM8500 is the filter of better plot was background noise and in general has the sound the a lot of his plus in my opinion. It has done the enormous quantity of difference to my sinister games and tutorials, doing them sound the most professional plot.

Partorisca A prize there is not founding the microphone that approaches to a quality of a XM8500. A quality of build is glorious and a sound is excellent. And all this partorisca just £17.

The microphone adds, to good sure would recommend.

(A video is the comparison among a Behringer XM8500 and A Behringer C-1.)
5 / 5 by
Beautiful microphone ,the quality of sound Adds and very done,the built-in filter of pop and windshield do quite well,when experience in the twenty big alfresco probably would require the additional shield but the normal use would be well with a built-in filter.
Has tried in diverse audio recorders the own,all has done fantastic with voice a lot clear without pleased with this microphone and tried to buy another like this backup
5 / 5 by
has bought 2 microphones a same time and a Behringer mic was an economic plus for some distance and has touched very better with less pickup of background noise. I have maintained this one and has sent another backside.
Is looking for The economic quality Dynamic microphone with look of the quality of sound adds further.
The mine has come with spending it chance aswell.
5 / 5 by
Was bit it dubious roughly buying the "more economic" priced mic and was honradamente a lot while any too much, this in spite of was surprised totally like quality of a mic and some products of sound is surprising, will be to buy some plus of these for my Karaoke Show in a very next future. He still among his chance of protective plastic/box possesses with cushion of foam. :-)
4 / 5 by
Hmmm. Where Beginning? As I am spent of the weeks that look and reading descriptions of some microphones abordables better partorisca podcasters and this mic a lot popup in my radar to the equal that have looked for was more expensive mics. I have bought the cardioid mic, which is extremely good but still would not fulfil my needs when those directed glimpsed in some gone.

I then decided to look for another pair of mics that could purchase for mecer around. I have found a XM8500 and has ordered two after reading the pocolos inform - better decision never! I produce it adds, the prize adds and directly to a point. Taken doing he in the pocolos second and happy with a result like this far.

To good sure will recommend this for a beginner and I see this XM8500 doing a work for the very long time. The decision adds that it purchases this product.
4 / 5 by
Ossia The good piece of boxes.
Bought it reason have been using the Stagg 15, which was well, but a profit has required to be on two big times like my instrument, and this looked to be that I say that a mic has not gone really sensitive enough. Also there is the terrible boom in a 'P' sounds, and enough the narrow row, which he difficult to sing to.
A Behringer XM8500 has solved all these questions for less than twenty crux.
Perfectly happy now.
5 / 5 by
Does not think calm goes to take very better that this for a prize. I have used a pleasure an additional commentary mic for a boxing has attached to the mine Tascam DR60D. They are now roughly to purchase the second a to substitute an original mic has used paralizaciones coms. This one is very better and slightly more economic that a mic is substituting.
4 / 5 by
Any one the professional musician or anything - just using this mic partorisca PA announce him and looks good and well has built. So only quibble is that among the a lot of sturdy (but quite big) plastic case - I follows sure he the fab does of the protect, but was a lot could add in or ship he in the compact plus mic pouch for day-to-use of day.
4 / 5 by
Have several pieces of Behringer train and is not never state disappointed. I have been using this like this the vowel mike for some time and am impressed with a quality of his and tone. It does not have an on/was the transmission but concealed is not the question for me. Extracted as well as the considerably Mike more expensive that possesses.
Like this to prize among the useful plastic chance.
5 / 5 by
Partorisca Be sincere, with my Mic pedal of feet of the Mechanic, partorisca the use of phase is equal to a Shure in two times a prize.

Well, the studio uses very so much and some limitations can be seen but has not bought partorisca the studio does more than happy to give five stars.

Updates the year on. I have bought four of these partorisca my own pa and eight partorisca the venue of the music where are usually in an office of the his to substitute flown SM58s.

Is THAT well. The professional singers are using mine weekly and the little has bought these after asking me that it was.
5 / 5 by
Was the little sceptic when ordering this mic, because of this insanely low prize - I has been expecting a quality of his to be subpar compared to a SM58. This in spite of, to the arrival has been tried bad. Behringer There is nailed this produced and with one covers right ins (compression, EQ etc), a quality of his comparable east to the mic value £100+. A quality of build is sturdy and a lot of weighted, and feels so only like a SM58... Also it looks lustrous af in all black. A mic also go in the good chance returned with foam, with the mic clip partorisca be quell'access perfecly. You recommend this microphone to any one looking for the dynamic mic, any @@subject his estimativa. If you are thinking roughly buying this, does not doubt - you will not complain it .
4 / 5 by
The value adds partorisca money. The good sounds. It comes with locating it which has an adapter partorisca edges of different measure, this is not immediately obvious, but use the coin partorisca take an adapter. Shopping again.
4 / 5 by
Surprisingly very partorisca a prize. Prpers Having looked by means of descriptions of countless user in an internet, a lot has declared that in of the blind tests he equals an action of a Shure SM58, which retails in five times a prize of a XM8500. My brother regularly uses this model partorisca vocal register (I prefers the condenser mic. Partorisca My deeper voice) and sounds perfectly well.
4 / 5 by
5 element of star in this point of prize. Probably still he 4 when compared to mics several diverse magnitudes more expensive.

Alternative sum to the condenser mic if background noise of the ones of partidário of the computer or alike. Abundance of weight in a section of boss that mark a quality of looks to build reassuringly robust. It comes with this own spend it the same chance when bought individually.

One down-key, but orderly looking mic.
5 / 5 by
Really could not think that well this mike was. Calm does not require partorisca be really look for his and is the better plot that far more expensive mike. Has all bought him in a group now and has included dipped a Shures has behind had like this reservations. The diverse prize the plot this in spite of like this tent around.
5 / 5 by
Partorisca More than chance, thinks that this could be the substitution directed partorisca a SM58. There is some utmost, has detailed descriptions with comparisons more technical, but partorisca me, connected to the small speaker, so only PA and partorisca home uses vocal this does a trick. Quality of good build and answered clear of my experimentation
5 / 5 by
had had a legendary Shure SM58 in my basket partorisca the year while to the drop of prize without regime, when this has on burst in the amazon recommends. I have read some good descriptions, and read on on he elsewhere, and has taken the casualidad...

Can do not comparing to a sm58, but can say you a sound of of the this is beautiful, rich and clear. Utilisation by means of Roland mini the cube and touches utmost. It is also he cools partorisca look too much.

Highly recommended
5 / 5 by
has not used this at length still, as so only can give the description has based on some messing around. This has the very clear sound, that surprises built in filtering to pop aswell, any @subject to the equal that speak his, there is not founding never any in brilliant or noise partorisca say a paper P or B. There is ab REALLY WELL feel to a Microphone and I like a chance comes with, partorisca this calm prize only tin a lot really complain.
4 / 5 by
Partorisca A prize can not beat this mic, clear, acute and joined-directional like any unwanted noise of surrounding zone. Perfecto partorisca phase or studio. Like this as well as and included better that some of a more expensive snob “ factor” of concealed them is in a phase.
4 / 5 by
85 / B++

Ossia the vocal microphone very competent for the prize adds. Taken on his own terms, in ignorant prize, ossia the decent dynamic mic with excellent construction. It is the good election for studios of house or rooms that has not been has treated acoustically. It does not choose on a lot of noise of some sides or behind, so that it minimises the echo or the feedback that use with the PA system.

Is like this as well as the industry regulates hand-held dynamic vowel mic, a Shure SM58? Any enough, but near...
Some bass proximity the effect is slightly more evident, as he boom the bit if a lot look for (especially voices viriles).
A mid-the row is slightly less diverse of a SM58, but is well.
There is marginally more managing noise that with a SM58, but so only takes the pair of mins to imagine was regarding the hand-held use and is the not issuing use the stand.
With these points are A lot of picky and have them remarked so only in the side for comparison lateralmente with SM58. For vocal use, you my desire to add the pop of foam-filter. An economic one will do (p. p.ej. £1-2).

+ Well For the half noisy means and refusing of the his axial (i.et. Rear noise/of the sides)
+ Animate vocals
+ Relatively net of audio
+ construction Very solid in house of metal (feels resembled Shure SM58)

Good election for the podcast, mobile DJ, studio of house, university/of schools. In professional of the upper end acts a SM58 is better, but for the slender margin. The majority of people will find this the good election. With a calm money saved can buy the decent mic stand and the Behringer XLR the USB 502 mixer. Ossia Amazing value .

He A Shure SM58 is quell'has bitten better, but any 5x better! It is the classical example of diminishing returns. All some weaknesses can be done around, as you are spending your money buys this.

My photo aims a Behringer (sinister) afterwards to the Shure SM58 (right) for some purposes of comparison. A filter of pop of the foam to some sinister accesses neither.
4 / 5 by
Was the little sceptic in a prize and that quality of sound would take to form this Microphone but has taken it casualidad in all the chance for tests.

Needless To say am impressed with him!

The container is in plot more than the thought - the hard chance with the cushion of foam houses a microphone, and the mic the clip is tucked in there also (has not expected that!)
A mic is weighted really amiably and has finalised was professionally. His obviously modelled in a SM58 benchmark and done the very good work in that!

Connecting he until my PA fixes - obviously regulate it XLR the returns of boss perfectly without subject - a row of discharge in front of a mic was a lot of and residual noice has not caused feedback included when I have dipped up in mine living room in front of some speakers (obviously not signalling in some speakers!) The tone has achieved was slightly 'warmer/bassier' that my forward SM58, but some adjustments in a EQ and are súper happy with a sound.

In an end of a day, his no a SM58, but his also the fraction of a prize! For me it takes 5 stars sure!
4 / 5 by
Ossia The decent microphone , included without considering a prize. If calm so only is taking the production of music, is the good place to start with :
- fact of the usable register of acoustic instruments
-He the decent work in viril vocals
- has to that record in the room without acoustic treatment, looks to tolerate these better that the condenser (but still touches better with acoustic treatment)
-does not require to be maintained in his box like calm with the condenser. For this can remain place up and ready to use.
When you Buy the better microphone (which will cost you at least £80), this a still will have his uses:
-can utilisations he for alive action
-Ossia a one that will leave you was when any one asks to take loaned the microphone
-anchors It can remain on in a mic stand everything of a time, in of the strikes of inspiration of the chance.
Does not forget to buy a XLR-XLR boss, mic stand, interface of audio and DAW. At all for him.
4 / 5 by
Has bought 2 of these in a last pair of month, a rest of a band has suggested taking Shure SM58s, but has not had of the money for that, as it take these and has had any question, sound like this as well as we require him to knots to and does not remark any difference among them and a Shure is. Everything for 1/6th of a prize. The only critic has is some clips of way of microphone to look comprised too small to returned an iron of a microphone, but has not had to use them in all the chance to the equal that have had already has adapted some
4 / 5 by
Really can does not be missing this for a prize. I have used he for vocals and for miking amps. At the beginning the used with a sm58 in the combo electrical guitar amp and has spent them some have thought of the times have had routed wrongly like two mics was like this looked. A mic has the good weight, feels sturdy, can manage pressure of his big and there is so only the touch less than the pointy midrange that a sm57 for heavy electrical guitars. For vocals would use this or a sm58 interchangeably - preferring this simply reason yes breaks was like this economic to substitute.
5 / 5 by
Loves this Mic. They are new to a subject of vocal register, but can say that this microphone has the very good quality, especially look in a row of prize. Construction very solid, grill of metal and a lot well is returned XLR socket with snapping system. An only minus there is remarked is a fact that a no returned microphone in a headline resupplied for a costruttore or am too feeble :). You are not the big question reason have bought the tripod with the boss that control a microphone perfectly. They are very happy with this compraventa. I recommend this crew.
4 / 5 by
Buy these for church.
Has had one of a SM58 mics and take the little of these Behringer some to have extra singers.

Can not say a difference in a quality of sound.

These do really well and is surprising considering a prize.
5 / 5 by
Well, like this thus prize knows it will not be the Shure SM58, but believe me, unless you are doing in the professional recording studio, calm will not be able to say a difference. It is solid, done a lot well, and does a work brilliantly. I have bought one of these for my edges to use in his band after listening a start of an economic mic at present uses. I have loved to take a SM58, but so only could not justify an extra cost, how has been for a XM8500 after reading descriptions of pro musicians and registering expert - and am like this happy has done. For a money, a XM8500 has not beaten can be!
4 / 5 by
Are the gigging music, has the band and also run the series of Open Mic chance and usually uses SM58s and SM57s like the @@subject of course. I have been lately the mic or two short when mic-ing multiple artists in of the bands. I did not like him dipping out of the tonne of money in a Shures has used for years, as has thinks that would order one of this so much the transmission. Out of the curiosity has used one of this main vocal pleasure mic for an evening and was blown absolutely was because I credit one was of vocal sound. Any subjects of feedbacks or any negatives and in fact looks to do all the prójimo-the vocal field mic would owe that - and do well. I have been impressed for as solid a mic felt also, feels like the quality has bitten of boxes and is presented amiably in a box. I am influenced by my ears more than snobbery or seal of prize - if this has had of the rubbish of summer , would say like this. These are really utmost mics and resist his own good in quality of his against his plus illustrious and expensive counterparts. I buy again? You have bet I .
4 / 5 by
That adds it mic. Has has wanted to something abordable that would create his of voice of the quality when plugged to the little portable amplifier and ossia. Has-liked me a fact that is insulated against feedback because this has been the question for me in a past using economic crew. It takings For a prize is the solidly the microphone has built that the chair adds in a hand and extracted really well. Any feedback included when when being in front of a speaker of portable/amplifier. Sure you mean it has to that tilt a mic to you and speak a lot of his - the will not listen tongues to a side of him. But I prefer to use the mic that way in all the chance. Another thing can do is to press a mic against your chin and resist it whole and listen you then reason a sound is coming from directly on. Calm only need to buy the mic agreement also, but has found Stagg SMC6 6 boss of the metre of microphone regulates economic in £6 if you are plugging to a XLR connector.

Top Customer Reviews: Skytec 12 Inch ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 3 ratings
4 / 5 by Brittanie
The better speaker has not had never like this far
the only thing is a Bluetooth loses conection when it bite it far but think that is normal with Bluetooth
averts these 5 stars
4 / 5 by April
Any sure if this speaker was fualty or that but was a lot of destalted in the low volume then has had to that pay 29 pounds to return
5 / 5 by Alessandra
Any insurances if this speaker was fualty or that but was a lot of destalted in the low volume then has had to that pay 29 pounds to return

Top Customer Reviews: Marantz Pro M4U - ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 44 ratings
4 / 5 by Makeda
This mic does not give a definition of same impedance like the mate of mine said has required partorisca the course in mine big Pro 1604 mixer, as I have taken partorisca bet. Pay was. A mic the lovely looks. I have seen Marantz and this was a lot enough for me. Masters an Audio Technica but is that? I can not resupply one! This mic looks to adapt my good voice for radio emissions. It can look to some another mics later, but are quell'has bitten fed up with faffing roughly, doing studio upgrades. I need the other of that for the moment. This little gem resupply with me enough excites to satisfy my craving for the decent microphone for now.

Has done the pair of tests. It is not taking a lot of sound of a cup. It looks to be better when being perfectly whole. There have it much more the front can lateralmente that of a cup. I will owe that ask my auditor to help me paralizaciones of tune lows, mids and trebs next week. Another that that, am very pleased now have the mic a mixer 'like'.

In a box: Microphone; soft mic has spent; stand of table; mountain of accident; XLR bend-the boss has finalised; spec layer and guaranteeed info.
4 / 5 by Foster
Was happy with east considering a prize, and registers a audiobook concealed the technical requirements of the amazon have fulfilled. This in spite of with which one projects has substituted he with is Locate NT1-A which is far upper ... Easier for an artist of voice to rid the nuanced action, easier for me to modify an audio, better final experience for an auditor. A Maranz is the good election if you are in the estimativa tight or if quality of the excellent audio is not the priority ... But it say to take something better for real professional use.

Four stars because it is still good value, and enough well for a lot of uses.
5 / 5 by Jodee
Has dipped one of these in mine ready navideña, as I have required the place compact plus until electrical guitar record acoustics. It is the very good quality mic, especially in this prize - crisp and responsive. Returned a mic to a desk the stand like pointed in a photo, and is quite stable for careful use. I have purchased another with which Navidad, so that I can register in stereo with results add!
5 / 5 by Brooke
As well as I go to say this is not the microphone to singers records as it is not a lot of responsive and is quite noisy in a signal the proportion of noise. This in spite of is well for tongue and would be adds for YouTubers.
Some accessories have comprised this the good value Mike for general use.
Laws well for reamping where a signal is well.
There have been good results with both bass and taxis of electrical guitar.
4 / 5 by Kandis
Need the podcast mic or record for gaming or Youtube then ossia the a lot of a lot of mic for a money. Fault of some low end, but takings quite near do up for him. One is is sturdy and mic muff done the good work that block out of plosives! To good sure recommend
4 / 5 by Pok
Like a title of a description says really - ossia so only the really well a lot-atrocity mic that the sound of products adds for VO work.

Am using this in my canal of Youtube/of Youtube - and also for some Voice-In laws that do like this splits of my work and is improved a quality of an audio considerably. I am running he by means of the Behringer Xneyx 302 USB mixer (to resupply a phantom beats) and then to the Tascam Dr.-05 recorder Audio. It is trace to the office-trace, extendable mic his and clipped to this mountain of own accident .

Is conscious that buys this, will require to be able to be able to him - calm so that it require the mixer or adapter that can resupply a phantom can require. Different a lot powered condenser mics, this will run in phantom beats like this down like 9 volts - like this does amiably with a start of a Xenyx 302.
5 / 5 by Shenna
Bought for studio of house.

Pros: Well to choose on acoustic intruments and voice. Excellent for acoustics of electrical guitar for example. His clear, any discernible noise (well down 70dB) and good definition by means of a spectre - very grave, decent mid and treble quite clear. Good exclusion of environmental noise (p. p.ej. The defender of PC is under a tope of noise), perhaps helped for curve of cardioid.

Gilipollas: A level of his east bit it down in 30cm of a mike - but ossia easy to the iron was with the pre-amp. What spongy (shield of wind?) It has been it bit it mashed in a box and you require to be very careful taking a mic to some groups like this cushioning look quite easy to peel was.

Resumid: Probably it calms it can not say a difference among east and the much more expensive mikes. I am not annoyed by a gilipollas listed - is better some savings of sides is in these trimmings that in a quality of his that it is glorious.
5 / 5 by Marcell
Has bought this mic like this splits of a upgrade to my register/streaming rigs and no active a lot the estimativa to touch with. As it take this together with the Steinberg UR12 interface, and am impressed felizmente with a quality, directed to take some levels dipped easily and has little noise pickup when registering.

A mic is a precise east +48v Phantom Beats like this an interface ( has some decent value some there, but running windows 10. Sure mark and control that has any subjects of engine, but the digress) or supply to be able to is has required to good sure.

In general very happy with a mic, and hope to use he in the number of upcoming projects
4 / 5 by Nellie
has spent this element with a Behringer Or-PHORIA UMC202HD and a sound is surprising, I cant listen any background noise. This mic is surprising for a prize and I highly recommend this element.
5 / 5 by Merilyn
A Marantz Professional MPM1000 fulfils everything of a characteristic of indication and comes the prójimo 2nd to the pair of mine Behringer microphones. They are quite happy with him and will not trade until anything in £100, when have the Interface of DAW and decent Audio, to facilitate some sounds of a Marantz.
4 / 5 by Gennie
Like a title of a description says really - ossia so only the really well a lot-atrocity mic that the sound of products adds for VO work.

Am using this in my canal of Youtube - and also for some Voice-In laws that do like this splits of my work and is improved a quality of an audio considerably. I am running he by means of the Behringer Xneyx 302 USB mixer (to resupply a phantom beats) and then to the Tascam Dr.-05 recorder Audio. It is trace to the office-trace, extendable mic his and clipped to this mountain of own accident .

Is conscious that buys this, will require to be able to be able to him - calm so that it require the mixer or adapter that can resupply a phantom can require. Different a lot powered condenser mics, this will run in phantom beats like this down like 9 volts - like this does amiably with a start of a Xenyx 302.
4 / 5 by Blanca
Need the podcast mic or record for gaming or Youtube/of Youtube then ossia the a lot of a lot of mic for a money. Fault of some low end, but takings quite near do up for him. One is is sturdy and mic muff done the good work that block out of plosives! To good sure recommend
4 / 5 by Tawanna
I have required the microphone partorisca some video of formation has had to that produce, but has not wanted to spend an earth in the RØDE mic.

Is the very small box, a mic is not pro level, but decent for a money. A antishock the mountain is good but a table the upper tripod is not until a lot, but useful in the pinch.

Quite pleased with east for a money is past.
5 / 5 by Elvina
A compraventa to estimate quell'impressed like any precise to be right after his for him to choose on well, the foot or two was is well. Used by means of the only scarlet leave to use decent headphones while gaming and not being turbulent for extra bosses to a headphone for the mic and any worry roughly loop of earth.
4 / 5 by Henry
For A prize ossia the add mic. Has the good tone that calm give you voice the rich quality but is also book of the pronunciations clearly. I have it quell'has used so only he for some voice overs for now but like this far am impressed and that looks forward to that he the plot more with him.
5 / 5 by Jeromy
These am very still podcasting, closing up speaks (interview or voiceovers) and is sold to aim these applications. I am not really suitable for register of the widest field (phase / of heart etc). As it depends that it calms the master use.
5 / 5 by Corrinne
Has registered my podcast of prime minister with him. It likes- one quality of him. Appearances takes the better capture among two voice likes one has had reverb and a no. But, has to them that research some more than comprising an ergonomics of a first room of can do them the pertinent test.
4 / 5 by Han
Has not expected such big quality, both in of the terms of construction and action, in this point of prize. It has surpassed far my expectations. If you are in the estimativa, grab one, will not be disappointed!
4 / 5 by Herb
Has used the Sure SM58 and changed to a Marantz MPM 1000. WOW That the different with registering vocals in the studio of house. A quality of his this very good. He so much among a box also. I can not recommend this element highly enough. Thank you Marantz
4 / 5 by Zina
Is really be happy with this microphone for a year that used it. I have done the number of small projects, using it to record vocals and the voice that read. It is it interprets it solid , but does not give you to to a detail still likes him something so has Locates to him NTA-1 (which now am using). It say that it is the interesting investment calm so only is beginning was, but is looking for the touch it professional plus, considers to spend bit it more.
5 / 5 by Ehtel
This chooses on the fart of the guinea pigs of 10 metres was, unbelievable pickup - utmost for a prize - I has this has attached to the vocoder and go to require the room of test of the sound for the use so that it chooses especially a background noise also.
4 / 5 by Kayce
Bought and has ordered the pair (any matched) for general use. Work perfectly and amiably sensitive. Well the accessories done , useful but sadly any chance to the equal that would have been welcome
5 / 5 by Tawanda
I have bought this like a upgrade to my Microphone dips on partorisca streaming and youtube video and the have any complaint. It comes with the mountain of incident and can return to any arms of microphone. It beats my leading USB-Snowball mic dipped up.

Personally would go them partorisca something more substantial yes is looking partorisca do register/of flange of the music. But partorisca general podcast, streaming or youtube video this is an excellent microphone.
4 / 5 by Kermit
Has required partorisca buy the microphone of decent quality partorisca use for podcasting, this looked partorisca like it would do a work. One is comes with him is not really adds, but yes calm attach it to the stand of pertinent microphone, he a work. A quality of audio is fantastic partorisca the word spoken, and highly would recommend the cost. Mark so only sure your mixer there is phantom can, has not verified before purchasing this microphone but felizmente mine mixer a work.
5 / 5 by Becky
Quality partorisca build a lot good. Solid but no too bulky or heavy. Good value partorisca money. Presence and good row. Used by means of the small mixer the office takes results a lot well with this microphone. Typical Marantz basically. Good quality and resulted good partorisca any too much money.
4 / 5 by Ruthann
Mint! Nizza Of Marantz partorisca dip diverging of this quality to this group of prize.
If you grumble roughly this in this row of prize, is the buffoon. An upper quality mic partorisca a prize; it is done the difference of entity to my studio setup.
Highly recommended.
Could spend &62;£200 partorisca something vaguely that approaches is. Trace (or a prójimo an on is not too more money - a 2000 - already has taken my eye in that!) :-P
5 / 5 by Ophelia
Has loved the low cost but quality and just value mic. This does a good work and that registers the quality is acceptable.
5 / 5 by Corine
Utmost microphones, but far more sensitive to the distance that had expected. Not Using if you are unable to situate them so only in front of a person that speaks.
4 / 5 by Melvin
Work but better to spend more and take something better for a money
5 / 5 by Ulysses
the condenser Adds mic, very sensitive and with quality of his a lot of
4 / 5 by Ronald
chooses on frequencies of your voice and miraculously transfers them on to the DAW in sonorific fashion
4 / 5 by Ethelene
It chooses on frequencies of your voice and miraculously transfers them on to the DAW in sonorific fashion
4 / 5 by Marjory
quality of Excellent register with the shield partorisca breathe and very well isolate vocals of external noise.
4 / 5 by Eleanora
Has arrived Yesterday, and has had few hours today partorisca try. Considering is so only £50 and the quite small, is excellent quality , the response of frequency adds and looks a lot ready. If your just start was in record and the production is perfect in estimativa for the microphone of condenser.
5 / 5 by Thuy
Has bought this for on-line streaming and is perfect for a work. Has his well, well crisp highs and quite a lot of lows. It is the microphone adds for a prize and all some accessories are in pleasant prize . Thank you Marantz!
5 / 5 by Virgil
Does well for the tongue is trace to the arm of boom where quality of the studio is not the worry
5 / 5 by Noel
Perhaps any one an upper quality, but is perfect for amateur producers
4 / 5 by Muoi
Quality of the build of excellent microphone is first partorisca register his I adds upper value partorisca money
4 / 5 by Jonas
Excellent Mic I use in my studio partorisca broadcast a good work.
4 / 5 by Jay
Amazing product, work astonishingly partorisca streaming and registering video games. Highly recommend it but so only the agree wont work unless shabby/partorisca have the phantom V48 supply partorisca Be able to-the recommend a ARTcessories Phantom2Pro
4 / 5 by Brenna
his Very good. It is probably a more economic solution master the good mic
5 / 5 by Owen
For a money ossia excellent. If I have had to that critique at all looks the tad sibilant the “ssss” but can eq that it was.
5 / 5 by Onita
The microphone of quality adds, particularly thus prize. Highly recommend it.
4 / 5 by Margret
Unsure If to go for the microphone the expensive plus with better specs but ossia perfect so that there is wanted.

Top Customer Reviews: Stunning Goodmans ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 1 ratings
4 / 5 by Raven
Very good but poor touching information like this concerned if on it uploads

Top Customer Reviews: IMG Stage Line ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 9 ratings
5 / 5 by Neda
I have used this microphone partorisca jazz and folk action. An advantage is that it is one of a lot little dynamic headset the available microphones, so that has no messing around with phantom crew partorisca be able to ; so only it goes directly to a socket of microphone of my amplifier of electrical guitar. A quality of his this a lot enough for the action interested or busking. Certainly it do not have any point that spends three times so much for slightly of quality of his big plus of calm is treating in a street or in the pub or café. Yes, a headset is tight, but has taken early has used his, and feels more robust that has been expecting.
4 / 5 by Rea
......Like this already mentioned in other descriptions on here one returning of a tape is not tight and the bad an ear that the returns like the glasses would be far better state and no more expensive that manufacture....
The sound supposes that it is that it attended with the product in this prize to the mine Shure stand of boom mic that the usually use him is not even in a park of same ball. An a lot of lower start volume also.
Certainly will not be the using in actions.... Work - concealed is roughly all can say....
4 / 5 by Alison
Distributes with the advantage of long connection and also has the 6mm the adapter has distributed also. I have bought this to use while touching drums and adding background voice.

His quite fiddly to return and wear, having two tampons lateralmente and the rear elastic band to resist he in place in your boss. Adjustment Of these is not like this easy to the equal that have to that be and he no the comfortable to spend. The backsides, the desire had bought the unit with on ear fixings looked to spend glasses.
4 / 5 by Ernestine
Laws well and use with practising amp to take the good sound and balance of instrument. Too easy to practise and then take the accident when the voice is spending for a amp. More ossia very better that the mic and stand when touching electrical guitar.
4 / 5 by Gema
Has been the help adds with our busking and actions of general action. All 12 members of band they maintaining uses him !
5 / 5 by Shenita
Has bought for my edges for the Christmas and loves it. Works perfectly with his electrical guitar amp
5 / 5 by Hassie
uses this for busking as it do not love has to that cart around the mic stand. Utilisations the model the economic plus but found was bit it tight around my big boss. This one returns better and touches better this in spite of with which roughly 2 hours have to take it was…ossia probably because of measure of boss. A partner tried it on and precise regulate an elastic section in a backside to do it smaller. An advantage is long enough for me to be while touching and movement in the has bitten. It is light to spend and robust quite like this to the long of calm so that it aim it the bit of priest in using
4 / 5 by Shanelle
Some advantages are far too a lot the time and the chair there is squandered time and money in this product
4 / 5 by Wesley
use this for busking as it do not love has to that cart around the mic stand. Utilisations the model the economic plus but found was bit it tight around my big boss. This one returns better and touches better this in spite of with which roughly 2 hours have to take it was…ossia probably because of measure of boss. A partner tried it on and precise regulate an elastic section in a backside to do it smaller. An advantage is long enough for me to be while touching and movement in the has bitten. It is light to spend and robust quite like this to the long of calm so that it aim it the bit of priest in using

Top Customer Reviews: ...

Rating: 5 out of 5 with 4 ratings
5 / 5 by Luanne
Last peice in mine musical Jigsaw.
There is wanted believes Tampon big fat, atmospheric, soundscapes. I love my Korg Kronos and Waldorf Blofeld to touch simultaniously so that I midday joints him. I subject wanted also the both by means of my Eventide Space, so that .
Has bought this little gem.
A Kronos and Blofeld spent in a backside. Then I exited him to a Eventide, is exited of there that to the mine Tascam digital recorder.
To the equal that knows to take both keyboards that touch the sound of the tampon big fat near, by means of my Eventide box of Spatial effects.
A Breaking of Art 4 is very very built, small and simple and opens on a lot of possibility, for money very small.
Has bought mine by means of years of Amazon Absolute Music. Recommended.
5 / 5 by Demetrius
Has HAD previously the laptop/pc/ipad/clave of fire (by means of 2nd monitor) is exited all melted by means of the series of rca adapters. Law, but some levels were during a place. You look in 20-£30 mixer solutions, but many neg descriptions around qualities of build and levels of noise. Found a splitmix4 bhy incident and whilst was more than has expected them spend, is worth it, has used to exist bosses with some rca to 1/4' jack adapters, has taken two minutes the setup, and is exactly the one who there are them wanted. Any noise, any fuss. I require dipped all your starts to 100 then use a mixer to regulate. Esees Has Taken mine in disposal to some old bose powered pc the speakers and one touch adds.
5 / 5 by Adelina
In general this does a lot well. The looks of qualities well. Any sure confidence he for súper-critical listening fulfilled but in a whole can not say a difference among spending signals by means of of the this and going directly of my interface of audio to monitors.

Thing to look for east...

Is very small and the sockets are annoyingly there is spaced closely. It can not return two of a normal plitter' the bosses uses afterwards to the each one like this another in an available space (and is not unreasonably chunky for the boss of big quality) to the equal that has had to that solder on some bosses of mine own that has known would return.

Each canal can have the habit of mix Or breaking, any both. Like this calm can not mix four entrances and send concealed to four starts, so only two and two. I can see reason is drawn like this (there there is so only a attenuator for canal) but personally would have preferred the creation where a signal to pause operates without any attentuation in this phase and you could mix four canals to an and then has left that the four fates. How it is it can live with 2+2 although. It controls a manual for some suggestions in of the configurations.

Is passive so that has the drop of big volume. It does not look to import for me but is using sources where a level of signal is down (eg the signal of level of direct instrument of an electrical guitar or something) this could cause the question to the equal that affects a yours level paste to signal any effects later in a canal.

In general am pleased with him, a lot of gain little device. Could see me taking another.
5 / 5 by Xiomara
My description is not in this particular product. I am revising ART, a company that mark a mixer. He the year has bought the electrical guitar fx rack of ART. A piece of rubbish cut roughly 700 dollars and has broken after only the pocolos use. A never honoured company with a guarantee and has had to them that dip a racks unit in some rubbishes. Or$ 700 flushed down a sewer.

Top Customer Reviews: Low Level Dry Ice ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 16 ratings
5 / 5 by Shin
This has done perfectly in a Beamz diagrams of smoke with built in light. Produced the fat fog that has on lit amiably and did not disperse too quickly, included although we have had a car out of a forward of door partorisca Halloween.
5 / 5 by Ewa
I have used this product before and fount his quality is consistently well
5 / 5 by Burl
im dissapointed In thinks it would be the patients of better looks has to that buy the different car with gel partorisca take an effect that want them.
3 / 5 by Theressa
Hours of fun!! espically Around halloween. Delivery very fast
5 / 5 by Retha
Tierra of perfect down level my paving of cookery IN 10 SEGUNDO and of the lasted 't sees my little daughter the one who has seated in a material....
5 / 5 by Hang
Produced the fog of fat/smoke. Quite decent for a money and has not evaporated quickly.
5 / 5 by Jackelyn
Amazing material. Fog hugs to the in earth so only likes in of some films
5 / 5 by Margarette
I have tried this fluid in a chilled diagrams of smoke (QTFX LF900) and a car of normal smoke. Work well in a chilled car and still in a normal car gives partorisca the smoke which hangs lower that normal smoke. A drawback is the quite acrid small.
5 / 5 by Doris
has used this product before and fount his quality is consistently very
4 / 5 by Candyce
im dissapointed in the thinks would be the patients of better looks has to that buy the different car with gel partorisca take an effect that want them.
5 / 5 by Lindsay
Tierra of perfect down level my paving of cookery IN 10 SEGUNDO and of the lasted 't go my little daughter the one who has seated in a material....
5 / 5 by Ezekiel
Produces the fog of fat/smoke. Quite decent for a money and has not evaporated quickly.
4 / 5 by Emilia
Material amazing. Fog hugs to the in earth so only likes in of some films
5 / 5 by German
has tried this fluid in a chilled diagrams of smoke (QTFX LF900) and a car of normal smoke. Work well in a chilled car and still in a normal car gives for the smoke which hangs lower that normal smoke. A drawback is the quite acrid small.
4 / 5 by Eddy
Any lower lying that flowed of normal fog, would give 5 stars are reviewing this like the fluid of fog regulates how is good quality and dense extra. For any a lot of money has customised them the fresh box to cold a fog, a lot of video tutorials on Youtube has interested...
5 / 5 by Connie
Has paid 20 pounds for delivery in some 3 elements have bought! Two wine punctually are still waiting for a gel fluent dry that no longer require like all the elements were for the party in the private function last Saturday! So much because of service of the delivery of the rubbishes has squandered 25 books in of the fluids and 35 in the car of fog and was unable to use them!

Top Customer Reviews: Flexible EL Wire ...

Rating: 5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
5 / 5 by Domonique
We sellotaped this to a cup of our stairs in some coverages like the sign partorisca look the stairs could be very dark in a night, His brightness is a lot enough for the sign to look but no too brilliant to be in entertained. Complaining not choosing spent he in model as I owe battery to change each few days.